![]() Scrutiny dangerous and painful during adolescence Adults also believe Black girls know more about sex. A 2017 study from Georgetown Law’s Center on Poverty and Inequality found adults view Black girls as less innocent than their white peers, especially between the ages of 5 and 14. Mason also notes that dress codes can be especially punitive to girls of color, whose bodies are more heavily scrutinized than white girls. "It's not that schools don't have a right to have a dress code, but you see these pretty pronounced disparities in the extent to which boys versus girls bodies are policed." That was probably a good lesson to learn," she said. I remember when I was in high school they said we couldn't have T-shirts with profanity on it. "I'm not saying that schools don't have a role in teaching kids what is appropriate. Kate Mason, a gender studies professor at Wheaton College, said school dress codes on their own can be useful, but they become harmful when they target one group over another. School dress codes that target female students have received increased attention in recent years, with experts arguing that their hyper-focus on girls is unfair and discriminatory. It fuels the dangerous myth that boys cannot control their sexual desires, which is often used to absolve boys and men when they commit sexual violence. And in including the word "distracting" in the girls list and not the boys, perpetuates the notion that women's bodies tempt men and must therefore be inconspicuous. Girls are told the appropriate length of their skirts, are forbidden to show any parts of their stomachs, can't use hair curlers, can't wear "excessive makeup" and must adhere to the mandate that "tops and shirts must cover the entire shoulder and they must be modest and not revealing or distracting," among other rules.Īs its designed, Bartram's dress code heavily polices the bodies of female students. The girls' section also has three bullets, but is packed with more detailed directives. ![]() Male students are instructed to ensure "mustaches and beards shall be neatly trimmed," that "revealing clothing" is unacceptable, and that pants "must be worn at the waist" with no underwear visible. The boys' dress code has three bullet points. Last month, before the school's yearbook editing fiasco, it came under fire for its dress code, which disproportionally targets female students. More on dress codes: California school's no-shame dress code empowers students to wear what they want A dress code of double standards "On the one hand you're giving the message to pretty young girls that women need to be sexualized to have value in this world and then on the other hand we're punishing them for participating in this. "There's just so much ambivalence," said Abigail Saguy, a sociologist at UCLA who studies gender dynamics. Yet when young girls, especially, attempt to live up to that expectation, to reveal their bodies even modestly, they are frequently scrutinized and punished. ![]() Johns County, Florida, embodies an ever-present double bind for women and girls who are told in myriad ways that in order to be feminine, desirable and culturally valued they must be sexy – they see it in the most-liked images on social media, in clothing ads and in the portrayal of their gender in movies and on TV. The drama at Bartram Trail High School in St. All the students were female, none consented to having their images digitally altered, and many of them said they felt humiliated by the incident. A Florida high school has attracted national attention for altering 80 students' yearbook photos to add more clothing to their chests and shoulders, obscuring cleavage and sometimes even clavicle bones. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |